What
is "gender dysphoria"? A mental condition which forms the
basis of identity of trans people, a distress born out of mismatch of
the body and the mind? Or are we distressed due to the pressure of
society's hidden and open expectations, rigid laws, backwards
traditions, malicious apathy and even open dehumanization? Is gender
identity merely an inner reaction to transphobia?
The
truth is certainly not in the middle. If you have seen any study or
news about the brains of trans people and felt weird about it, your
intuitions are spot on. Natural sciences usually take gender and sex
as self-evident truths, otherwise it would risk being too
"ideological". Despite the sincere intentions of many, it
is hard to believe that psychology can be a stable ally to trans
people because gender is fundamentally an unfriendly institution to
trans people. I understand that nonsense like "brain gender"
might be useful to appease your parents or your therapist but folks,
it is not a coincidence that trans people who defend these things the
most, the loudest transmedicalists, are plainly bad people who enjoy
kicking down poorer, more marginalized trans people. They might hate
themselves and don't know how to deal with it without projecting it
to others or think they are above being a freak based on getting some
validation but either way, they alone disprove the idea that
"dysphoria" is an illness that simply requires a cure. Even
the most well intentioned versions of the idea concede that certain
ways to self-identify are more legitimate. Gender is a social
construction, one which fitting in clearly necessitates putting down
an underclass of "other". So gender dysphoria has to be a
construction as well. Gender is not something that can be merely
assigned, it needs to be personally actualized too. There will be
those who cannot fit in not just because they don't want to
participate but also can't because their actualization goes against
how gender is constructed in the first place. Of course,
participation is not optional so there are consequences for failing
to do so. More than a relationship between body and the mind, gender
dysphoria is a cluster of feelings that manifests by the struggle
against the punishment.
But
why do do only some people carry the type of feelings that forces
them into this struggle? People are always more complex than what
they show on the outside. Some people come out as trans after
decades. Some people struggle with it but for one reason or another
don't ever act upon it for their entire lives. But I am still
confident that most people don't really have such issues. On this
topic my mind always goes back to a Turkish sitcom from years back. I
don't know when it aired, I don't remember its name. I did not even
watch a single episode start-to-finish. But I remember it's trailer:
A guy breaks up with his girlfriend, and as punishment she makes a
deal with a witch to turn him into a woman. "He" wakes up,
goes to the toilet and finds that there is nothing there. It's not
like this show circulated for years and years or I watched TV so
frequently that I saw it often enough to burn it into my memory. I
did not even think about it during that time. No, it really aired a
short while, then vanished, just like hundreds of other Turkish
shows. And yet I still remember that trailer in particular, as a
memory frozen in time. Safe to say that this doesn't happen to
everyone.
Trans
people are clearly not distinguished merely by action, be it
self-identification or a set of procedures for social recognition but
by thought as well. No wonder Western conservatives are so worked up
about gender-neutral pronouns. Having a gender-neutral pronoun does
not make a society less patriarchal, for example Turks have a very
patriarchal culture despite speaking a mostly gender-neutral
language. It only makes writing more convenient but no, even this
small space of conceptual ambiguity is too much to concede.
There
is probably nothing wrong about trans people's brains but there is
probably something in there. Because no matter how hard it is
repressed, gender nonconformity is always present somewhere in all of
human history and the patriarchal society demands its continuous
repression. It might be labeled a sin, a bad influence, a rebellious
streak, a mental illness or a subversive ideology. But it must be
ironed out from children by proper discipline. Failing that, adults
must be made into outcasts.
If
you offered me a dress when I was little I would have considered it
insulting. I remember trying to get into football many times because
most boys liked it. I had never been curious about my mother's
makeup. At least the way most people saw it, there was nothing
unusual with my interests. I just had a myriad of daydreams about a
girl that grew up with me. She did many things but always thought
like I would and acted in a way I admired, strangely very close to my
personality without its most noticeable flaws. Strangely she never
ever spoke to me or existed in the same thought-space as me
but she was quite frequently in my imagination. This only intensified
in high school, in a glaring way that affected my school grades.
(They were still good but nowhere near good enough to justify the
total hours spent on attempts at studying.) Even though I wrote very
little about it, I conceptualized a lot of stories where she was
inserted in my favorite media. And yet, I never told anyone about it.
For
a long time I have not even thought about what those daydreams were.
Perhaps I was thinking of my ideal woman? There were times she was
romantic with generic non-descript guys and even was pregnant in some
scenarios. For some time, I have thought that I would one day get
married, have kids, then get old, just like other people. I
frequently thought about how I would care for my future wife. But I
have never seriously thought of myself as a groom, a husband or a
father. I hated wearing fabric pants and those leather shoes adults
wear. It took me a long time to get used to wearing belts and jeans,
mostly succumbing to exasperation. I hated anything that made me look
like an adult man. Especially the beard...
Even
though no one really bashed my head on how "men do this and
women do that", no one restricted my toys, no one in my close
proximity was openly sexist. Despite adopting a mostly "live and
let live" outlook and having a clear sympathy towards things
that aren't "normal", the society I grew up in clearly
ironed out my behavior. Maybe I had read about it in newspapers once
or twice, but I didn't even have a conception of what a trans person
was. If not for a series of chance encounters I could have just lived
my life getting more alienated from the world day by day. But even if
the repression became complete, I would always look at my own photos,
and hear my own name and feel a little strange without ever
understanding why. The thought was always with me since I knew
myself. I would always think about her. Did my brain separate
itself from my body at birth? I don't know. But there is clearly a
large separation between my physical existing self and what I have
always wanted to be. Today even if I had the perfect guarantee that
everyone would perceive me as a woman I would still not like how I
sound, because puberty happened without my input and I don't like the
result. Truly if people thought of me as beautiful and desirable but
my voice remained the same as now that would make the disconnect
worse. Trans people who are confident in their voice are cool,
admirable and uniquely captivating. But I always wanted to be a cis
woman, I am sorry. I ignored how much this irked me for so long
already so I don’t think I can ever be convinced to quit being
bothered by this. I have a deep seated issue on this subject in
particular, passing is really a secondary issue.
Had
I grown up in a different society (without oppression) would I feel
different? Perhaps. Of course, in a different society I would be a
different being. In a better society, we would be able to take any
steps we need in the ways we want to look without any judgment. Then
perhaps a specific designation like "gender dysphoria"
would not be necessary. perhaps differentiating between trans and cis
people, or even men and women would be obsolete. But perhaps I would
still be dissatisfied with my puberty. But even if we somehow knew it
wouldn't matter, because I grew up in this society. I know that I
have certain desires that have been with me for a long time and know
several things that would satisfy them at least somewhat. But any
sort of idea that suggests these desires would go away in this or
that scenario is not only irrelevant but fails like all naturalisms
do.
Humans
are inseparable from their environment and we can't view humans as
something that simply takes a parameter from society and gives a
result. Bio-essentialism asserts that the environment can be reduced
to mere cause and effect and a "pure human", an "essence"
can be reached by sufficient isolation. However, this supposedly
anti-essentialist stance agrees with that. Whether the pure human is
heritable or a clean slate is actually a small difference. And not
even a very sturdy one. Here, the criticism of the beauty industry
provides an excellent case study. In a push for impossible beauty
standards, young girls and women in particular are continuously
disempowered to make them isolated unless they join in to the painful
and expansive perpetual consumption. It is clear that there are a lot
of industries that are sustained by this pain. Diet, cosmetics and
fashion are among the largest offenders. When someone says something
like "Makeup is fun" the obvious response is that personal
experiences and societal trends can exist in opposition and they
should be critical towards the advertisements targeted at them,
especially when the advertising is done by their peers. No, that
sounds too sensible. The "choice feminism" needs to be
completely defeated. So, it turns out that women actually never
authentically enjoy makeup, they always do it for men and it's "fine"
to do it but you are giving in to the system. People have dyed their
faces everywhere since humans learned how to, you might want to
specifically appeal to other women, women pursuing beauty at all is
also considered vain so perhaps patriarchy as a whole is less about
specific actions of women and more that "woman" itself is
wrong? No it is very simple, capitalist patriarchy in, makeup is out,
no capitalist patriarchy no makeup. Thus it becomes necessary to
imagine a "pure human" that is not contaminated by
capitalism. Unfortunately we see this a lot in discussions where the
anti-patriarchal argument falls into naturalism by making assumptions
that are both irrelevant for those who are alive currently and can be
easily modified into supporting an oppressive system.
But
even if essentialism did not creep in, the argument would still be
reductive. If dysphoria merely reflected oppression, why, even though
many trans people do, do I not dislike my height? No matter what the
world deeply tried to instill in me to equate smallness and womanhood
but it could not. I might feel insecure about it if it caused people
to clock me but in that case, it becomes so easy to distinguish the
external pressure. Many trans people are comfortable with their
genitals, or would care much less if the society did not fixate on
them. Some trans people’s drive clearly is motivated not merely by
dysphoria, but other thoughts that are still, fundamentally, very
transgender. There are those people who explicitly don't want to be
seen as man or woman, others aspire to become a "butch woman"
or a "femboy". There are those who are mostly fine but
nevertheless decide that they would be happier as a different gender.
For some, autism makes the cis society difficult to swallow and
embracing being trans becomes simple. There is probably a good case
to be made for why neopronouns could emerge in an early 21th century
Western society, but it could seldom explain why people are motivated
to adopt them. What we can clearly understand is that they are
personally important to some people. The more someone deliberately
chooses to be outlandish about gender, they become motivated less by
society and more by themself. Surely, part of it is a reclamation of
the outcast identity but the larger part is that people clearly find
pride and enjoyment in having a fire-forged identity right out of
their hearts, living as unbothered by the boxes of society as much as
they can. Gender is a theater and all trans people reject their roles
but some people want to be playwrights, they want to play in their
own play.
Trans
people are persecuted ruthlessly over mundane and trivial requests.
We, especially those of us who live in particularly repressive
circumstances, deserve the world for staying alive each day. By the
merit of our struggles alone we can say that our wishes about
ourselves deserve special attention. But the struggle does not define
everything! I would love nothing more than just waking up as a cis
woman tomorrow and yet, despite the struggle, I find some joy in
deciding who I really am. Despite the prevalent opinion, I am fine
with the MtF label, because I see it as an acknowledgement of my own
decision to become myself. Our names are more deserving of respect
because we choose it for ourselves. Years of thinking made me
understand myself in a way that most people will never bother to do
and that's why I can be certain that my self-image issues come from a
wrong puberty, thus I need and deserve any medical procedure that
undoes the damage. Gender dysphoria, euphoria, confusion, decision,
none of those are meaningful just by the mere act of struggle, they
mean something because of how I decide to shape myself.
Very
often however, this is seen as a rhetorical inconvenience. I have
seen sentences like "X is good/justified because it was born out
of oppression" a bit too many times, the x can be really
anything here. The lazy materialism is bad enough but the implication
that the oppression passively bestows virtue is even worse. We hardly
ever need this clutch, something can be good or bad on its own terms.
Most things don't need to be justified with collective trauma. It is
not less serious when we feel pain or simple comfort for reasons we
don't entirely understand. Oppression just sucks. It doesn't bring
validation. There is nothing enriching about having to choose between
filial love and self-respect, between my safety and dignity, between
paranoia and ennui. It is all cruel, heavy, crushingly dull and
heavily maddening. But I will never accept that I am merely a sponge
absorbing my misfortune. My infinite appreciation for pleated skirts
will always triumph over the lost time I am accumulating each second
I am in the closet.
Gender
dysphoria is not enough to define me. It is not the universal trans
experience. It is certainly much more than a collection of heritable
impulses, if they exist at all. Society is at fault for our distress.
Yet, even though I can't say this for any other trans person, I am
the problem to myself, I am the only person that can fulfill
my oldest wish.
This
article is written thanks to my dearest Patrons, namely: Effy, Laura
Watson, Makkovar, Morgan, Olympia, Otakundead, Sasha. Also thanks to
Alex(@punishedgenetic on Twitter) for his perfect editing work.